Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

objective function unification #53

Closed
rb004f opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #52
Closed

objective function unification #53

rb004f opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #52

Comments

@rb004f
Copy link
Contributor

rb004f commented Oct 21, 2020

Consider unifying the objectives (and problem formulations) min_ne, min_opf, and min_ne_opf as a single function. min_ne is min_ne_opf without opf and min_opf is min_ne_opf without ne. With 0 cost provided as inputs, min_ne_opf could be used to model all three examples. Is there value in modeling these three problems independently?

@tasseff
Copy link
Member

tasseff commented Oct 21, 2020

I think this makes a lot of sense, and I would prefer to collapse these problem specifications into one. Then we would eventually have only three problem specifications: gf, ne_opf, and mld.

@rb004f rb004f linked a pull request Oct 28, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants