You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider unifying the objectives (and problem formulations) min_ne, min_opf, and min_ne_opf as a single function. min_ne is min_ne_opf without opf and min_opf is min_ne_opf without ne. With 0 cost provided as inputs, min_ne_opf could be used to model all three examples. Is there value in modeling these three problems independently?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this makes a lot of sense, and I would prefer to collapse these problem specifications into one. Then we would eventually have only three problem specifications: gf, ne_opf, and mld.
Consider unifying the objectives (and problem formulations) min_ne, min_opf, and min_ne_opf as a single function. min_ne is min_ne_opf without opf and min_opf is min_ne_opf without ne. With 0 cost provided as inputs, min_ne_opf could be used to model all three examples. Is there value in modeling these three problems independently?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: