You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Run file compilation listener such as webpack --watch or something similar with Gulp/Grunt in
docker container.
From your host machine, edit a file that suppose to trigger the compiler to run..
Expected Behavior:
Compiler will be triggered with the file change.
Actual Behavior:
Compiler is not triggered.
Workaround:
Run with docker-sync but this requires a lot of resources.
Change from volumes_from to volumes for mounting the APPLICATION path.
So my question is, should we consider moving from volumes_from(that creates data container) to volumes which will mount APPLICATION directly to each container?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Hi again 👋 we would like to inform you that this issue has been automatically closed 🔒 because it had not recent activity during the stale period. We really really appreciate your contributions, and looking forward for more in the future 🎈.
This is related to below issue in Docker for Mac:
docker/for-mac#148
To reproduce this issue:
webpack --watch
or something similar with Gulp/Grunt indocker container.
Expected Behavior:
Compiler will be triggered with the file change.
Actual Behavior:
Compiler is not triggered.
Workaround:
docker-sync
but this requires a lot of resources.volumes_from
tovolumes
for mounting theAPPLICATION
path.So my question is, should we consider moving from
volumes_from
(that creates data container) tovolumes
which will mountAPPLICATION
directly to each container?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: