/
draft-heitz-idr-large-community-04.txt
336 lines (194 loc) · 10.3 KB
/
draft-heitz-idr-large-community-04.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
IDR J. Heitz
Internet-Draft Cisco
Intended status: Standards Track K. Patel
Expires: March 8, 2017 Arrcus
J. Snijders
NTT
I. Bagdonas
Equinix
A. Simpson
Nokia
September 4, 2016
Large BGP Community
draft-heitz-idr-large-community-04
Abstract
A new type of BGP community attribute that contains communities that
each hold a 4-octet AS number and a 8-octet opaque field is defined.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 8, 2017.
Heitz, et al. Expires March 8, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Large BGP Community September 2016
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Large BGP Community Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Textual Representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Error Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Implementation status - RFC EDITOR: REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION 4
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9.3. URIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction
A Large Community attribute is defined that encodes 12 bytes
communities, suitable for 4-Octet Autonomous System Numbers that
require 8 octets of locally significant opaque data.
The Large Community is specifically designed to accomodate routing
policy related to 4-byte ASNs, as it allows operators to specify two
4-byte ASNs and still have room for 4 bytes for an action. For
example, to make a request to AS65551 to add 3 prepends when sending
a route to AS65536, one might add the Large Community
65551:303:65536. AS65551 would publish a list of large communities
and their associated actions. The Large Community is opaque.
To ensure rapid and smooth adoption of the new community attribute,
it must be as similar to the [RFC1997] community as possible, only
bigger.
Heitz, et al. Expires March 8, 2017 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Large BGP Community September 2016
2. Large BGP Community Attribute
The Large Community Attribute is a transitive optional BGP attribute,
with the Type Code (suggested 41) to be assigned by IANA. The
attribute consists of a set of Large Communities. All routes with
the Large Community attribute belong to the communities listed in the
attribute.
Each Large Community is encoded as a 12-octet quantity, as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Autonomous System number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Local Data Part 1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Local Data Part 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Autonomous System Number: This field indicates the Autonomous System
in which the Large Community has a meaning.
Local Data part 1: data set by network operator
Local Data part 2: data set by network operator
3. Textual Representation
The textual representation of the Large Community is A:B:C, where A
is the Autonomous System number, B is the Local Data part 1 and C is
the Local Data part 2. A ranges from 0 to 4294967295. B ranges from
0 to 4294967295. C ranges from 0 to 4294967295. A, B and C are
plain decimal non-negative integers without leading zeroes. Each
number must appear, even if it is 0. For example, "0:1:2" cannot be
written as ":1:2". The string is expected to match the following
regular expression: ^[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+$
4. Error Handling
The error handling of Large Community is as follows:
o The Large Community attribute SHALL be considered malformed if its
length is not a non-zero multiple of 12 bytes.
o An UPDATE message with a malformed Large Community attribute SHALL
be handled using the approach of "treat-as-withdraw" as described
in section 2 [RFC7606].
Heitz, et al. Expires March 8, 2017 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Large BGP Community September 2016
5. Security Considerations
TBD
6. Implementation status - RFC EDITOR: REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION
This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942].
The description of implementations in this section is intended to
assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort
has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not
be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
exist.
As of today these vendors have produced an implementation of Large
BGP Community:
o Cisco IOS XR
o ExaBGP
The latest implementation news is tracked at
http://largebgpcommunities.net/ [1].
7. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to assign a BGP path attribute value for the Large
Community attribute (suggested 41).
8. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Ruediger Volk, Russ White, Acee Lindem, Shyam Sethuram,
Jared Mauch, Joel M. Halpern and Nick Hilliard for insightful review
and comments.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC1997] Chandra, R., Traina, P., and T. Li, "BGP Communities
Attribute", RFC 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC1997, August 1996,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1997>.
Heitz, et al. Expires March 8, 2017 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Large BGP Community September 2016
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC7606] Chen, E., Ed., Scudder, J., Ed., Mohapatra, P., and K.
Patel, "Revised Error Handling for BGP UPDATE Messages",
RFC 7606, DOI 10.17487/RFC7606, August 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7606>.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.
9.3. URIs
[1] https://largebgpcommunities.net
Authors' Addresses
Jakob Heitz
Cisco
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95054
USA
Email: jheitz@cisco.com
Keyur Patel
Arrcus, Inc
Email: keyur@arrcus.com
Job Snijders
NTT Communications
Theodorus Majofskistraat 100
Amsterdam 1065 SZ
NL
Email: job@ntt.net
Heitz, et al. Expires March 8, 2017 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Large BGP Community September 2016
Ignas Bagdonas
Equinix
London
UK
Email: ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com
Adam Simpson
Nokia
600 March Road
Ottawa Ontario K2K 2E6
Canada
Email: adam.1.simpson@nokia.com
Heitz, et al. Expires March 8, 2017 [Page 6]