Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question] Detail list like last year #17

Closed
alneven opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

[question] Detail list like last year #17

alneven opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@alneven
Copy link

alneven commented Aug 16, 2022

hello @laroche / Florian,

last year I've prepared somehow a detailed list about my trades like this
(https://imgur.com/a/ArF1UGR)

now I have something total different, is there any switch I can create this again?
thank you!

@alneven
Copy link
Author

alneven commented Aug 16, 2022

humm, or maybe it was me who created this based on the output csv ?! :suspect:

@laroche
Copy link
Owner

laroche commented Aug 19, 2022

This was output as normal text, but was never very good to maintain.

Current best way is to use "--output-csv=tax.csv" to generate a new CSV file with
all information. And with a spreadsheet program you can easily add/remove a few columns
for a final report.

best regards,

Florian La Roche

@laroche
Copy link
Owner

laroche commented Sep 15, 2022

I've added a "--verbose" Option which outputs the transaction list as text.
Though I recommend to use the CSV output file for further processing.

All data from the old text output is now included into the output csv or the summary csv.

Closing this request for now. Please re-open with new data or a new request if you feel
strongly about further changes to the current version and how they should look like.

best regards from Germany,

Florian La Roche

@laroche laroche closed this as completed Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants