-n and -v give very similar (read: the same) output

[hashhar]

Both -n and -v options give similarly formatted output... I think we should add a header like: "Operations that would have been performed:" to the -n option.

[laurent22]

I've probably implemented it that way based on the output of commands like rsync, which also don't indicate that they are running in dry run mode:

$ rsync -aP -n temp/ temp.test/
sending incremental file list
created directory temp.test
./
1.txt
2.txt
3.txt

I think it makes sense because you want to know exactly what would happen in dry-run mode, including what output would be generated (for example, if it's parsed by other tools). If we add a header the dry-run and regular mode will have different outputs and that could be a problem. So unless there's a good reason for it, I'd rather leave it as it is.

[hashhar]

Makes sense.