You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for sharing the code. I wonder if it is possible to use the algorithm when the slice order is unknown, i.e., svr.ParZ.SlOr is unknown. I tried to set svr.ParZ.SlOr to an empty array, but got the following error: Inappropriate slice order identified, SKIPPING. Is there a solution to this problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Junshen, that's a good point. Would recommend setting
for v=1:NV
svr.slOrd{v}=([1:4:NY(v,3) 3:4:NY(v,3) 2:4:NY(v,3) 4:4:NY(v,3)])';
end
with NV the number of stacks and NY(v,3) the number of slices of stack v. This is 2x temporal subdivision of stack acquisition with 2 levels, so kind of natural choice for distributed coverage of slice axis in the absence of other information. Have checked that it is suboptimal when compared to real order of slices, but for certain orderings may provide acceptable results.
Hope it helps, any other question, don't hesitate to raise.
Hi, thanks for sharing the code. I wonder if it is possible to use the algorithm when the slice order is unknown, i.e., svr.ParZ.SlOr is unknown. I tried to set svr.ParZ.SlOr to an empty array, but got the following error: Inappropriate slice order identified, SKIPPING. Is there a solution to this problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: