Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(tactic/observe): have a claim proved by library_search under the hood #10878

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

jcommelin
Copy link
Member


Open in Gitpod

@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR t-meta Tactics, attributes or user commands labels Dec 18, 2021
@sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you add a test (importing as little as possible to make sure that the test is fast)?

Co-authored-by: Rémy Degenne <remydegenne@gmail.com>
@ericrbg
Copy link
Collaborator

ericrbg commented Dec 18, 2021

also, should we put a linter to make sure this is never used in mathlib proper? otherwise it lgtm

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member Author

Good idea. Done.

Copy link
Member

@robertylewis robertylewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seconding the request for tests, otherwise looks good!

src/tactic/observe.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@robertylewis robertylewis added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Dec 18, 2021
Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <Rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Dec 18, 2021
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin I think this is still awaiting-author for tests, right? Otherwise it's looking good.

@robertylewis robertylewis added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Dec 20, 2021
@jcommelin
Copy link
Member Author

Whoops, I thought I pushed a test, but I didn't push 🙈

@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Dec 20, 2021
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Dec 20, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Dec 20, 2021
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Dec 20, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(tactic/observe): have a claim proved by library_search under the hood [Merged by Bors] - feat(tactic/observe): have a claim proved by library_search under the hood Dec 20, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Dec 20, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the observe branch December 20, 2021 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) t-meta Tactics, attributes or user commands
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants