Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 10, 2020. It is now read-only.

new security consideration: PROBES might expose common creditor ancestors #4

Closed
michielbdejong opened this issue Nov 11, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor

if DFS backtracks, and a forward or cross edge exists, some nodes may find out if some of their in-neighbors (i.e., creditors) have a common ancestor.

@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor Author

one solution would be to always only try one sibling out-neighbor, which might not be such a bad idea, given that if ddcd did its work well, backtracks should normally be quite rare.

@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor Author

Discovering common creditor ancestors is actually a feature if you want to balance those creditors against each other. Still worth mentioning this security consideration in the whitepaper or in the FAQ, though.

@michielbdejong michielbdejong changed the title new security consideration: ddcd-dfs might expose common creditor ancestors new security consideration: PROBES might expose common creditor ancestors Sep 13, 2018
@michielbdejong
Copy link
Contributor Author

this is already discussed in the Traffic Analysis section of the whitepaper.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant