Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pretrained models #2

Closed
Abdulrahman-Elsayed opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Pretrained models #2

Abdulrahman-Elsayed opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@Abdulrahman-Elsayed
Copy link

Hello,
if I need to use for example the Casia WebFace pretrained model, what model of the five models should I use?
image

I would understand if there is only two models, one for Casia and the other for MS1M, but there is 10 models, what's exactly the differenc ebetween them and why to chose one over the other?

Thanks in advance.

@YeolJ00
Copy link
Collaborator

YeolJ00 commented May 18, 2022

Hello,

Thanks for your interest in our work.
In our paper, we evaluate our model on five different test datasets.
The pretrained models are the best performing models for each test set.
You can use any of the five links to verify the performance.

@Abdulrahman-Elsayed
Copy link
Author

Thank you for yout response.
But I'm a little confused, why there is one model for each evaluation set? Why not only one model train on Casia and used for all the 5 evaluation sets?
Is the evaluation process modify something in the model, so that we need to save one model for each evaluation set?

@YeolJ00
Copy link
Collaborator

YeolJ00 commented May 19, 2022

The evaluation process is identicall for all test sets.
So there is no problem for using any of the five models to evaluate all five tests sets.
We just wanted to provide the best checkpoints from a single training procedure.
Thus the accuracy obtained from the pretrained model may be slightly higher than the numbers reported in our paper.

@YeolJ00
Copy link
Collaborator

YeolJ00 commented May 19, 2022

To avoid confusion, we now provide a single model for each dataset!

@Abdulrahman-Elsayed
Copy link
Author

OK. Thank you very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants