Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Survey F2FS(Flash Friendly File System) #52

Closed
mocchira opened this issue Feb 27, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

Survey F2FS(Flash Friendly File System) #52

mocchira opened this issue Feb 27, 2013 · 8 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@mocchira
Copy link
Member

Currently we'd recommend LeoFS users using xfs where to store raw data files,
but F2FS might become more suitable one when using SSD.
let's check it out!

@essen
Copy link
Contributor

essen commented Feb 27, 2013

Have you evaluated btrfs before?

@yosukehara
Copy link
Member

It seems to be good fs, I've read as the follows:

Let we survey it, too.

@mocchira
Copy link
Member Author

Personaly I did it on Ubuntu12.04(v3.5).
As you may know, Since btrfs is still under heavy development status,
I often encountered unpredictable performance degradations AND crashes :(
but int the near future, I hope it will become de fact standard :)

@essen
Copy link
Contributor

essen commented Feb 27, 2013

Ubuntu is always 6+ months behind unfortunately.

@mocchira
Copy link
Member Author

Latest v3.8 still have many problems for example like this,
So I will evaluate it if I have spare time :)

@essen
Copy link
Contributor

essen commented Feb 27, 2013

Yeah I suppose for something that's mostly writing and few reading it's not good enough yet.

@ebuk
Copy link

ebuk commented Jan 28, 2014

We use ZFS on Illumos which has both an ARC (in memory cache) and L2Arc (second level SSD cache). Leo works exceptionally well on this setup - with a very very high cache hit rate in the Arc.

@yosukehara
Copy link
Member

We does not plan to survey `F2FS', yet. So I've closed this issue.
If we decided to start to survey it, we'll reopen this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants