New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New line options #67
New line options #67
Conversation
All right I have to check and try this... |
First of all, this is a great idea to have some more customizability for your plots. That being said, the previous format ( |
Surely, we need the GUI, and not just for non-tech-savvy users. But on the other hand, most of (if not all) Obsidian users know basic markdown, and I think the syntax is fairly simple to learn:
So, why not have both? 🙂 |
I would say we use the new syntax in the markdown code block. The GUI is just a Zero-Code way for users to generate such a code block. So zero code GUI and your syntax in the markdown code block? I'll merge yours and then go from there with the GUI. Sounds good? |
1 similar comment
I would say we use the new syntax in the markdown code block. The GUI is just a Zero-Code way for users to generate such a code block. So zero code GUI and your syntax in the markdown code block? I'll merge yours and then go from there with the GUI. Sounds good? |
Exactly! |
This looks really good! |
I expanded the "function" syntax to allow more options:
color
,graphType
,nSamples
,range
andclosed
.With these new options, functions can be written like:
and the spacing and the order don't matter:
I chose
@
as a separator because other characters are likely to appear in math equations. Also, the#
may appear incolor
because it also accepts HEX codes.