Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to treat words that belong to multiple cognate sets #260

Open
martino-vic opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

How to treat words that belong to multiple cognate sets #260

martino-vic opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@martino-vic
Copy link
Contributor

Had erroneously opened a lexibank issue in the cldf repo (cldf/cldf#129), so am tranferring it to here now.

If I understood the answer correctly, words that belong to multiple cognate sets should be treated the following way (minimal example):

Form Cognacy
1
bűbáj 1
báj 2
bűbáj 2

supposing the etymology of bűbáj is being a compound from bű + báj

Would this be correct?

@LinguList
Copy link
Contributor

I would suggest to use partial cognate coding: multiple cognate sets in this form are never transparent, and I strongly suggest to avoid them (see our discussion here).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants