Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Internet Exchange Point (IXP) is ill-defined #41

Closed
ianainet opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Internet Exchange Point (IXP) is ill-defined #41

ianainet opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
consider Something to review o consider Correction Suggestion to correct an error

Comments

@ianainet
Copy link

ianainet commented Feb 1, 2019

IXP definition is not current or accurate.

For instance, not just "large network providers" connect at IXPs. These days "brick-and-mortar" companies connect, as well as small ISPs, etc.

This is incorrect: "A typical service provider will access tier 1 global providers and their networks via IXPs"
Global "tier 1" providers do not connect to IXPs typically. On the rare occasions when they do, it is for test peering, not for production traffic.

This is incorrect: "IXPs are sometimes referred to as Carrier Hotels"
Carrier Hotel are buildings with many carriers present. IXPs are separate, although they frequently are located inside Carrier Hotels to make it easier for carriers to connect to the IXPs. Outside of the US, they are usually run by separate corporations, and a single IXP can span multiple buildings and/or Carrier Hotels in the same building.

@mtrifiro
Copy link
Contributor

mtrifiro commented Feb 2, 2019

@ianainet Thank you for filing the issue. Could I convince you to take a stab at editing/rewriting the definition? You seem to have the necessary domain expertise.

@mtrifiro mtrifiro added consider Something to review o consider Correction Suggestion to correct an error labels Feb 2, 2019
@ianainet
Copy link
Author

ianainet commented Feb 6, 2019

Yes, I will work on a better definition. Thank you for the opportunity.

@alexgmarcham
Copy link
Contributor

Do we have an updated definition to hand currently?

@alexgmarcham
Copy link
Contributor

@ianainet Have you had a chance to look at this?

@alexgmarcham
Copy link
Contributor

@ianainet Looking to issue a new version of the glossary this month - please add an update if you have it.

@alexgmarcham
Copy link
Contributor

Can be reopened if an updated definition is available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
consider Something to review o consider Correction Suggestion to correct an error
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants