Relative/absolute record name conversions

[mholt]

Hi,

Over in the libdns repo, we're discussing standardizing the use of relative or absolute record names in libdns.Record structs. The current consensus is that they should be made relative (i.e. for a record named sub.example.com in a zone called example.com, the name should become sub). This may affect your provider implementation.

When you have a chance, would you please check out this issue? This is the last call for feedback before we decide and I push the changes, and I want to make sure we get it right for the majority of DNS provider implementations so we don't have to change it again.

Link: libdns/libdns#12 (comment)

Thank you!

[mholt]

(Sorry, forgot about this issue!)

After much discussion we settled on using relative names with conversion functions.

Thanks for maintaining your libdns repo!