Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

All tables intended for including should be included #43

Open
bertfrees opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

All tables intended for including should be included #43

bertfrees opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
idea Just an idea, there is no clear consensus yet that this is the way to go

Comments

@bertfrees
Copy link
Member

bertfrees commented Feb 5, 2015

Ideally all tables that are intended to be included in other tables should actually be included. We should not expect the user to know which tables to include for which purpose and at which point it should be included (the order of including tables matters). Display tables are an exception because they have a special meaning and they are always the first table in a table list.

So ideally the user should only have to specify two tables, one display table and one translation table. The translation table will contain all the necessary metadata to be able to select it based on a list of features (see #41).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
idea Just an idea, there is no clear consensus yet that this is the way to go
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant