Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Netonix Switch Vlan Information Missing #6663

Closed
Andreser opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Netonix Switch Vlan Information Missing #6663

Andreser opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@Andreser
Copy link
Contributor

I've recently Installed LibreNMS for a Client and noticed when adding a Cisco switch to libreNMS that there is a tab with information about it's vlans. We are a ISP and on our network we use Netonix switches but don't have any VLAN tab on our Netonix Switch page. Our install is up to date.
Is it a MIB problem?
I did an snmpwalk on my netonix switch and I noticed some info appearing with the names we are using for our vlans, for example:

SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.7.1.4.3.1.1.1 = STRING: "Management"
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.7.1.4.3.1.1.3 = STRING: "OP1"
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.7.1.4.3.1.1.20 = STRING: `"OP2"

Is this a LibreNMS issue or should I contact Netonix for an update on their MIB files?

@laf
Copy link
Member

laf commented May 17, 2017

We don't have specific support for netonix vlans so if they don't use the standard BRIDGE-MIB then custom support needs adding. Please open a feature request on the community site if that's the case or discuss this on irc / community site.

@laf laf closed this as completed May 17, 2017
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented May 16, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 16, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants