Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Maximum Fragment Length TLS extension #214

Open
clementperon opened this issue Aug 5, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Implement Maximum Fragment Length TLS extension #214

clementperon opened this issue Aug 5, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@clementperon
Copy link

It seems that Libressl doesn't support maximum fragment length negotiation extension : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066#page-8

A patch has been posted on openssl group https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mailing.openssl.dev/fQxXvCg1uQY/_g09FmmhvgwJ

Could you review and integrate it for 2.5.X release ? This will be very usefull for embedded clients who can't allocate big buffer in RAM.

Thanks,

@4a6f656c
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have an actual use case for this? If so, could you please provide further details.

@clementperon
Copy link
Author

Yes instead of several call on a server i would like to receive one "big" json (around 8Ko) and parse it on the go. I am not able to allocate more than 2ko of RAM for TLS.

@bob-beck
Copy link
Contributor

In what application?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 03:08:50AM -0700, Cl??ment Peron wrote:

Yes instead of several call on a server i would like to receive one "big" json (around 8Ko) and parse it on the go. I am not able to allocate more than 2ko of RAM for TLS.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#214 (comment)

@clementperon
Copy link
Author

clementperon commented Aug 30, 2016

IOT device (cortex M4, 128ko RAM)

@bob-beck
Copy link
Contributor

So this is not a public application. Do you know if OpenSSL is taking that patch?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:15:08AM -0700, Cl??ment Peron wrote:

IOT device

You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#214 (comment)

@clementperon
Copy link
Author

The patch is planned to be merged post 1.10 : openssl/openssl#1008

@rojer
Copy link

rojer commented Dec 24, 2018

+1 on this. it is very important for IoT connectivity where 16K contiguous allocation requirement is a problem. OpenSSL already supports this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants