You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the rapid portion is worth twice as many points as the blitz section. This means we had to generate a manual markdown table instead of using the native leaderboard, even though the format (SRR&DRR) is ideal for it.
It would be nice if there was a factor in the round settings you could set manually. For example, if you set the factor as 2, a win is worth 2 points, a draw 1 point and a loss 0 points. Similarly, a factor of 0 could be used for tiebreaks, with the results indicated inside brackets: 12 (3), 12 (0) etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Broadcasts have an automatic leaderboard function, which generates standings based on game results across the broadcast.
It is designed to work in Round-Robin formats, where all the participants are present in all rounds.
However, in some tournaments, some rounds are “worth” more than others. For example, in the following broadcast
https://lichess.org/broadcast/2022-vugar-gashimov-memorial/q2H7Oi6j
the rapid portion is worth twice as many points as the blitz section. This means we had to generate a manual markdown table instead of using the native leaderboard, even though the format (SRR&DRR) is ideal for it.
It would be nice if there was a factor in the round settings you could set manually. For example, if you set the factor as 2, a win is worth 2 points, a draw 1 point and a loss 0 points. Similarly, a factor of 0 could be used for tiebreaks, with the results indicated inside brackets: 12 (3), 12 (0) etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: