You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I find there's a performance comparision with VIIDEO in Table 1. But the VIIDEO algorithm needs luminance as input according to the released code from LIVE.
I want to know if you just transformed the .mp4 file into .yuv and then send it to VIIDEO? Would this cause any disturbance to the final result?
Thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@stillbetter For the video with RGB format, we used the MATLAB functions VideoReader, readFrame, rgb2gray to get its luminance component (See below). We did not try pre-processing the video to YUV format first.
v = VideoReader(vidname);
count =1;
while hasFrame(v)
ydis1 = double(rgb2gray(readFrame(v)));
try
ydis2 = double(rgb2gray(readFrame(v)));
catchbreak;
end
[feat] = computeVIIDEOfeaturevector(ydis1,ydis2,...
blocksizerow,blocksizecol,blockrowoverlap, ...
blockcoloverlap,filtlength);
param(count).featvect =feat;
count =count+1;
end
Hi, Dr.Li:
I find there's a performance comparision with VIIDEO in Table 1. But the VIIDEO algorithm needs luminance as input according to the released code from LIVE.
I want to know if you just transformed the .mp4 file into .yuv and then send it to VIIDEO? Would this cause any disturbance to the final result?
Thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: