Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(EVMOS): fix name of native evmos coin #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2022
Merged

fix(EVMOS): fix name of native evmos coin #103

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2022

Conversation

mathiasmoeller
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -1135,14 +1135,16 @@ const basicCoins: BasicCoin[] = [
// > EVM
{
key: CoinKey.EVM,
name: 'Evmos',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should leave the name as Evmos (https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/evmos)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah wasn't to sure either, I took EVMOS because that's what Chainlist showed:
image

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also the story requested EVMOS: https://lifi.atlassian.net/browse/LF-1684

@@ -1135,14 +1135,16 @@ const basicCoins: BasicCoin[] = [
// > EVM
{
key: CoinKey.EVM,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it also make sense to change the CoinKey.EVM -> CoinKey.EVMOS?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The story explicitly asked to keep it EVM: https://lifi.atlassian.net/browse/LF-1684
I don't have a strong opinion on it 🤷

@mathiasmoeller mathiasmoeller merged commit 60490c0 into main Oct 25, 2022
@mathiasmoeller mathiasmoeller deleted the LF-1684 branch October 25, 2022 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants