You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
customer feedback seems to be that the most useful level for tracking dependencies is the class — as opposed to a higher level (by package, by source file) or a lower level (by method)
We will need to write new code to aggregate dependencies at the class level. (Version 0.1.2 produces detailed dependency information but does not aggregate it in any way.)
We should:
Generate a full report showing all of the aggregated dependencies
Make the aggregated information queryable in the REPL, so e.g. if class C is of interest, we should be able to ask for C’s incoming dependencies and outgoing dependencies
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
customer feedback seems to be that the most useful level for tracking dependencies is the class — as opposed to a higher level (by package, by source file) or a lower level (by method)
We will need to write new code to aggregate dependencies at the class level. (Version 0.1.2 produces detailed dependency information but does not aggregate it in any way.)
We should:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: