New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to resolve by stream? #592
Comments
We can introduce a gaufrette resolver. Sounds reasonable to me. |
+1 for a Gaufrette resolver. |
any takers on this? |
I tried to write something myself, and I ended up with some code. But my main issue is how to get the asbtraction work with every implementation. So, I implemented my GaufreffeResolver, but in the |
I see, it is hard to use gaufrette as a resolver. but can at least use it as a data loader, would it be useful? |
Why closing it, something was done? |
The interface of a resolver is richer than stream can provide us with. So nothing to do here. The stream data loader is already here. |
I think the issue is about working with Gaufrette by stream, and not by using objects provided by Gaufrette. |
The PR is very welcome, I dont see much sense keeping it open, since it is just an addition which is not block us in any way. |
The PR is very welcome (: |
Well, if someone wants to have some time on it, the issue keeps track of it. For instance for some Symfony hack day. |
This needs an issue with a more clear description of the feature and the requested implementation. Create a new issue with clarifications, link this one, and close when done :) |
I'm using LiipImagineBundle with Gaufrette.
Gaufrette is configured to use aws S3, so I configured a StreamLoader. So far so good.
Now the problem is that I'm not able to resolve thumbnails via Gaufrette, since the only way I found here is AwsS3Resolver, that is not what I want: AwsS3Resolver bypasses Gaufrette and so I cannot use Gaufrette options (most notably the "directory" options), but the worst point is that this completely defeats the Gaufrette abstraction layer (e.g. I cannot easily switch between filesystem abstractions).
So, is a stream resolver really missing here, or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: