Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recency: Newer games contribute more to weights than older ones. #31

Open
Jonathan003 opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@Jonathan003
Copy link

Jonathan003 commented Feb 22, 2024

Can you please add an option for Recency for calculating the book move weights.
If a move is out of fashion in the input pgn file, it most of the time has a good reason.

@likeawizard
Copy link
Owner

I'll have look and think. But my initial reaction is - no, the polyglot format has a very specific meaning for the weights and that is purely based on the outcomes of the games win +2, draw +1 and moves for lost games are not included. I do not think tinkering with these weights is a good idea and breaking the expectation that the format is built on.

In that case I would probably suggest filtering games from the PGN file itself before composing a book. And I of course wan't to find the time to touch up possible filters which would exclude games from being added to the book.

@Jonathan003
Copy link
Author

Filtering out older games from the PGN before composing a book is a good plan but only if there is an alternative more recent game.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants