You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are many things one may learn from your work here with CovidNet, as it is robust work that will reasonably help to push/democratize Ai in a positive direction.
One thing of note, is that there are expected regimes for which xray/ct based techniques, be it by human or by ai, are expected to be viable. Unless I am mistaken, I did not detect that in the CovidNet paper nor the CovidNet/repository's readme file.
I think a similar section from the repository seen in issue 55 after title "Preliminary Conclusion", concerning expected constraints on testing/diagnosis, should be considered for CovidNet.
A quick snippet can be seen below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
JordanMicahBennett
changed the title
Missing Expected regions where xray analysis is expected to perform well
Missing Expected regions where xray analysis is expected to be viable
May 7, 2020
There are many things one may learn from your work here with CovidNet, as it is robust work that will reasonably help to push/democratize Ai in a positive direction.
One thing of note, is that there are expected regimes for which xray/ct based techniques, be it by human or by ai, are expected to be viable. Unless I am mistaken, I did not detect that in the CovidNet paper nor the CovidNet/repository's readme file.
I think a similar section from the repository seen in issue 55 after title "Preliminary Conclusion", concerning expected constraints on testing/diagnosis, should be considered for CovidNet.
A quick snippet can be seen below:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3666405/81241487-03539400-8fd0-11ea-920d-f48820080a3b.png)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: