-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional questions about capabilities #46
Comments
Regarding linking capabilities to GSBPM, presentation of Flavio at MWW2020 available on this link |
Regarding:
I think we should, since Cross-Cutting and Core are well-defined:
Lower-level capabilities are just sub-capabilities, they can be modeled with skos:broader, like sub-processes to phases, or better with part-of. |
@FlavioRizzolo mapping between GSBPM/GAMSO and Core/Cross-cutting capabilities seems to be exchanged? |
Yes, I fixed it! @InKyungChoi |
The ESS has a Business Capabilities model that might be worth checking https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/statistical-enterprise-architecture/document/ess-earf-business-capabilities-model |
Can we link GAMSO Capability Development to COOS "Capability"? |
Some examples of capability development from Geostat4: Engage to develop, use and promote new standards |
I agree, that should be a core reference. We do use the ESS Business Capabilities model at StatCan, and it was also an inspiration for CSDA. This particular paragraph could shed some light on the alignment between business capabilities and functions:
And this one between capabilities and activities:
|
It makes sense, the question is how we do that since Capability Development is an individual and Capability is a class... |
Relevant content integrated in specification, closing issue. |
The Capability class is now included in the COOS. Additional questions, which are probably not for version 1.0 but for further developments:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: