Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

News item detection in RBB content #4

Open
lyndonnixon opened this issue Jul 29, 2014 · 9 comments
Open

News item detection in RBB content #4

lyndonnixon opened this issue Jul 29, 2014 · 9 comments

Comments

@lyndonnixon
Copy link

Can WP1 "detect" using the bumper detection for chapters and an assumption on the common structure of every RBB news story which chapters are indeed "news items" as opposed to intros, closes, or other news segments (weather, interview etc.)

Can this be tagged somehow in the Exmaralda?

@e-apostolidis
Copy link

Let's start by determining the different classes of temporal fragments in an RBB news show (i.e., intro, close, weather, kiosk (newspapers), interview, etc.). So, it would be a good start if the RBB partners prepare a list with all these different categories. Afterwards, we have to find out which one is the most appropriate way to detect these fragments and to assign the needed label (according to the provided list of classes/labels) to each one of them.

In general, this is something duable using a combination of 3 different visual analysis techniques (i.e. shot segmentation, concept detection and bumper re-detection) and a new set of rules for finding the appropriate cuts between the different chapters, but it's really hard to have it fully tested and running before August 15.

Regarding the last question, I believe that the integration one more label/attribute for each defined chapters, in the Exmaralda is not a big trouble (but I have to discuss this with DanielS).

@lyndonnixon
Copy link
Author

Next step @nicorbb "prepare a list with all these different categories"
Then @Daniel-Stein agree on format for one more attribute for video chapters in Exmaralda files
Finally @rtroncy update the TV2RDF service to recognise this attribute and also propagate it inside the RDF

@nicorbb
Copy link

nicorbb commented Aug 13, 2014

When do you expect these inputs and - actually - why?
From what I hear from @OlliInno CERTH already presented a good strategy in Amsterdam:

  • detect host and glue the video following the host moderation together to one chapter
  • detect interview situation and glue this to the preceeding video

IMHO, RBB's editors do not expect more than this! There is no request (that I have heard of) to automatically detect what kind of content can be found inside a chapter! We only want clear start and end marks for a chapter and for that the existing strategies seem to be sufficient!?
Please let me know, in case I missed something

@lyndonnixon
Copy link
Author

@nicorbb yes of course we can leave it to editors to tag an automatically extracted video chapter as being a News Item (see also Editor Tool issue linkedtv/editortool#15)
If this can be done automatically, it is nice to have already in the Editor Tool some of the workflow done (suggesting a set of entities for that news item, suggesting enrichments) but OK for now we close this one.

@e-apostolidis
Copy link

From CERTH's side, as I already mentioned, the annotation of different detected parts of the video is something duable, after defining the different categories of chapters and integrating a set of rules in the current software. However, I would say that a bilateral discussion between CERTH and RBB would be the best approach for concluding if the current algorithm is sufficient enough or something more is needed. So, let's say that this issue is closed for now, but we can re-open it again if a new demand from RBB's side appears.

@nicorbb
Copy link

nicorbb commented Aug 18, 2014

Yes. And no ;-) I feel the need for action is on me now, but I am still not sure what exactly is expected and to which end. Could we just have a small talk on this next week in St Gallen?
I am willing to follow my actions but I can't take on more actions right now - sorry

@e-apostolidis
Copy link

Yes, I think that a small talk (and maybe a brief video demo) at St. Gallen, in order to clarify the analysis capability of the current RBB chapter segmentation algorithm and find potential extensions of it, is the best that we can do.

@lyndonnixon
Copy link
Author

I reopen this. So, my understanding is RBB communicated that based on CERTHs current news bumper detection you can consider every chapter excluding the first and last chapter in a news video to be a NEWS ITEM. Correct?
If so, I close this issue once WP1 confirms it can automatically label every RBB chapter according to this definition as NEWS ITEM in the REST service used for the LinkedNews scenario (configuration).
AFAIK you need to (ad hoc) define news items inside the EXB file in some way (IMHO it doesnt matter how exactly as long as you document this and communicate it to EURECOM for TV2RDF, i.e. by adding a comment to issue linkedtv/ontologies#8

@lyndonnixon lyndonnixon reopened this Oct 8, 2014
@e-apostolidis
Copy link

"So, my understanding is RBB communicated that based on CERTHs current news bumper detection you can consider every chapter excluding the first and last chapter in a news video to be a NEWS ITEM. Correct?"

Yes!

"If so, I close this issue once WP1 confirms it can automatically label every RBB chapter according to this definition as NEWS ITEM in the REST service used for the LinkedNews scenario (configuration). AFAIK you need to (ad hoc) define news items inside the EXB file in some way (IMHO it doesnt matter how exactly as long as you document this and communicate it to EURECOM for TV2RDF, i.e. by adding a comment to issue"

I can confirm that CERTH plans to do this.

To be more precise, this is something implemented (yesterday) and will be supported by the new version of the WP1 REST Service (you will receive a detailed e-mail about the updated WP1 REST Service, in a few moments). Jose-Luis will be informed appropriately about the changes in the EXMARaLDA file and then I will post a comment to issue linkedtv/ontologies#8 as you suggested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants