Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Microcode check problem on CentOS #123

Closed
duck-rh opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Microcode check problem on CentOS #123

duck-rh opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@duck-rh
Copy link
Contributor

duck-rh commented Jul 19, 2018

Quack,

Running in verbose mode needrestart run the following command:
iucode_tool -l -s 0x000106a5,0x1 -tb /lib/firmware/intel-ucode

This end-up failing:

microcode bundle 1: /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/0f-02-06
…
microcode bundle 47: /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/06-0e-0c
microcode bundle 48: /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/list
iucode_tool: microcode bundle /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/list: unknown microcode format

and

Failed to check for processor microcode upgrades.

Similarly as what is done in #106 I tried using --ignore-broken and the result is much better:

microcode bundle 1: /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/0f-02-06
…
microcode bundle 96: /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/0f-06-05
selected microcodes:
  060/001: sig 0x000106a5, pf_mask 0x03, 2013-06-21, rev 0x0019, size 10240

and

The processor microcode seems to be up-to-date.

It is easy to add the option in /etc/default/intel-microcode but I wonder if this should not be the default mode of operation.

\_o<

@liske liske closed this as completed in eeda0a1 Jul 21, 2018
@liske
Copy link
Owner

liske commented Jul 21, 2018

Thanks.

@liske liske added the bug label Jul 21, 2018
@liske liske added this to the v3.4 milestone Jul 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants