New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do not require redundant REUSE_ENTRY command #4

Open

dtikhonov opened this issue Dec 7, 2017 · 0 comments

Milestone

dtikhonov commented Dec 7, 2017

Section 7.1.1 of the first draft states that

If the encoded name component refers to an existing entry, this entry is reused as described in Section 7.1.2.

This is a wasted byte. The reuse of existing entry in this case is implied and should be inferred by the decoder.

litespeedtech added this to the Second Draft milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment