Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: switch to type-lens #550

Open
guacs opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Enhancement: switch to type-lens #550

guacs opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@guacs
Copy link
Member

guacs commented May 17, 2024

Summary

We have a lot of utility functions to help us figure out the various types from models and extract information from them. A lot of this is now included in type-lens, so we should be switching to using that instead.

cc: @peterschutt

Basic Example

No response

Drawbacks and Impact

I'm not sure if there's an easy way to do this without making breaking changes. There may be, but I am inclined to make the breaking changes regadlless. I don't think it would effect users too much since most likely it would only change things like FieldModel and some other stuff that polyfactory which, while technically public API, are probably not used by many users.

Unresolved questions

No response


Note

While we are open for sponsoring on GitHub Sponsors and
OpenCollective, we also utilize Polar.sh to engage in pledge-based sponsorship.

Check out all issues funded or available for funding on our Polar.sh dashboard

  • If you would like to see an issue prioritized, make a pledge towards it!
  • We receive the pledge once the issue is completed & verified
  • This, along with engagement in the community, helps us know which features are a priority to our users.
Fund with Polar
@guacs guacs added the enhancement New feature or request label May 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant