New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use language server to replace its completion? #12
Comments
Hey, what is your opinion? If you agree, I think I can do it 😄 And if you are busy, you can add me to collaborator 👍 |
Collaborator invite sent. I don't think the existing completion function has to be removed, you can keep it as is and extend it with the language server support, for the language server is not always available. |
Perhaps we can disable completion when |
By default only the omnifunc is defined, can you elaborate on how it interferes with the completion from the language server? I guess they can just co-exist as these two completions have different triggers. Line 6 in dbe1de3
|
Oh, let me rethink if there are any method to combine LSP with this plugin. |
There is a language server for dot. Can we remove the completion function and let user to use language server, just keep compile function (LSP doesn't have this feature)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: