You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I encountered an irrational result while evaluating on the SUN3D dataset following the config in this repository.
It got much less AUC scores than those in the paper.
I am wondering if any config setting I need to change by myself to nearly reach the accuracy shown in the paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! Sorry for the late reply. I've checked the evaluation codes and I found I forgot to add a "pair" directory (downloaded from the OANet repo) in the "data" directory. I've added this in the README.md and the codes produce similar results as in the paper now. Thanks for pointing out this problem.
Hi! Much thanks for releasing the code.
I encountered an irrational result while evaluating on the SUN3D dataset following the config in this repository.
It got much less AUC scores than those in the paper.
I am wondering if any config setting I need to change by myself to nearly reach the accuracy shown in the paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: