Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About evaluation metric(CD) #44

Closed
TLB-MISS opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

About evaluation metric(CD) #44

TLB-MISS opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@TLB-MISS
Copy link

First of all, thank you for sharing this great work.

In the eval_mesh.py code, points are sampled from depth to compute the chamfer distance. Actually, I don't really understand this process. There is already a mesh, so why bother rendering the depth and re-sampling the point instead of directly sampling the point from it?

@TLB-MISS
Copy link
Author

Does that make a fairer comparison between different methods (rather than sampling points directly from the mesh)?

@liuyuan-pal
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the advice!
Actually, I directly borrow the evaluation codes from my previous work here https://github.com/liuyuan-pal/NeRO/blob/3b4d421a646097e7d59557c5ea24f4281ab38ef1/eval_synthetic_shape.py#L87
I think sampling on the mesh is also feasible and fair.

@TLB-MISS
Copy link
Author

@liuyuan-pal

Thanks for your advice!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants