-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SD21 models? #56
Comments
Same question. |
rightnow 2.1 models are only available from community implementations |
yes! I have stopped using 1.5 and no longer train on it or support users that wish to fix issues in it. I am currently training 1.2 million images on 2.1. if you need help making the 2.1 models, please help us figure out how to help you. if you don't want to make 2.1 models, i would really like to know why. 1.5 is a dead model, and needs to be upgraded to 2.1. |
please reopen this so we can track the issue and other users can come along and add a +1. |
@xarthurx it looks the training failed. what scripts are you using? |
@lllyasviel what do you mean by "failed"? For "box-like" buildings, default generation by SD without CN always have this "zig-zag" line issue for the facade -- that's way I asked if CN can help with this issue in another post, and you recommended "tile". I'm using the default one from the diffusers' example folder (dreambooth), feeding my own data. |
@xarthurx Rightnow I believe the most technically correct training method is kohya_ss https://github.com/bmaltais/kohya_ss Feel free to try it. The resulting quality can be much higher and it is as optimized as A1111 |
This one is for LoRA, isn't it? But how does it relate to "optimized as A1111"? I understand A1111 as a webUI with additional scripts to simplify the process of passing different parameters... Is this wrong? For all the experiments I have made, I'm using simple prompt without any modification -- I can make the image looks nicer with prompt engineering, but this is not the purpose at the moment. I'm targeting a better base model (or LoRA perhaps) with better generalization ability. Prompt Engineering is the next steps for the users/students. And from the above example, I assume SD v2.1 are doing better than SD v1.5 for this stage. Hope the explanation makes it clear. |
A1111/kohya_ss and Diffuser are different in many details and A1111/kohya_ss usually have higher visual quality. A1111/kohya_ss have lots of people trying to tune every line of codes and every pixel to maximize the visual quality so the result can be greatly different from other implementations. And sometimes I think A1111’s default method Euler A is an unpublished algorithm and someone should write a paper about what detail modifications make the result quality so high. |
Thanks, I'll do several tests/benchmark with this and update here. Just to follow up with the topic of this issue, is there any plan to release an official version of SD v2-series in the near future? |
probably best to stay away from A1111's anything if it cannot be verified where it has originated. |
Hi All, |
Pardon me if I missed something, but the example for the filename format has sd21 and sd21 768 as hints that they exist, but they're not in the models folder. Is it just the config that sets the difference up? I would think the model has to be actually trained for 2.1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: