You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I built the assembler, I left hooks in for supporting assembler input in other formats, including xa65 and ca65. (I put in an AsmParserVariant for ca65.) It would be helpful for people coming from ca65, to support assembler sources that use ca65 idioms, macros, and functions.
Now, the ca65 assembler specification is huge. I don't think we will want, or need, to implement every little ca65 feature in our assembler. But a more reasonable target would be to start by supporting sufficient ca65 functionality to be able to compile the ca65 libraries, and have them match 1:1 with the code compiled by ca65.
When I built the assembler, I left hooks in for supporting assembler input in other formats, including xa65 and ca65. (I put in an AsmParserVariant for ca65.) It would be helpful for people coming from ca65, to support assembler sources that use ca65 idioms, macros, and functions.
Now, the ca65 assembler specification is huge. I don't think we will want, or need, to implement every little ca65 feature in our assembler. But a more reasonable target would be to start by supporting sufficient ca65 functionality to be able to compile the ca65 libraries, and have them match 1:1 with the code compiled by ca65.
See also
llvm-mos/llvm/lib/Target/MOS/MOS.td
Line 52 in 2550bb7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: