Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Meta] Android+Clang platform support #21794

Closed
stephenhines opened this issue Oct 31, 2014 · 36 comments
Closed

[Meta] Android+Clang platform support #21794

stephenhines opened this issue Oct 31, 2014 · 36 comments
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla confirmed Verified by a second party metabug

Comments

@stephenhines
Copy link
Collaborator

Bugzilla Link 21420
Version trunk
OS other
Depends On #17204 #18576 #20796 #21332 #21498 #22694 #23182 #23654 #24205 #24934 #28509 #12269 #13379 #15458 #15584 #17765 #18184 #18295 #19292 #21314 #21352 #21666 #21795 #21946 #21964 #22318 #23130 #23651 #23834 #23881 #23934 #23940 #24058 #24178 #24271 #24362 #24483 #24485 #24760 #25713 #26168 #26867 #26944 #28767 #29003
CC @Arnaud-de-Grandmaison-ARM,@cmtice,@majnemer,@echristo,@eugenis,@hiraditya,@kbeyls,@kbeyls,@rengolin,@stephenhines

Extended Description

This bug will track progress towards building a complete working Android platform using clang. Additional bugs will be connected as necessary until everything works and Android has migrated all (or almost all) projects to build with clang.
@stephenhines
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added Dan, Kristof, and Renato initially. Feel free to CC in others (and add relevant blocking bugs).

@rengolin
Copy link
Member

rengolin commented Mar 2, 2015

Stephen / Bero,

It seems that AOSP can now be compiled almost entirely with Clang, so I wonder which of these bugs are still happening / relevant. Some of them look really serious, others not so much, so would be good to have a cleanup before we can start addressing them in Clang/LLVM.

cheers,
--renato

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Mar 2, 2015

Could someone take a look of 22756 and 15086?
They are important to build AOSP for x86 devices.

I am using -fno-optimize-sibling-calls to work around the tail call optimization, bug 15086. For movaps problem, I don't have better work around than replacing structure coping statement with memcpy.
Thanks.

@stephenhines
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Bug 24932 isn't actually a blocker for Android, since it is using a TOT clang, and not one of the platform-supported versions.

@stephenhines
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Whoops, this should have seen a dependence on bug 25794 instead of 22199.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #21795

@eugenis
Copy link
Contributor

eugenis commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #21946

@berolinux
Copy link

mentioned in issue #21964

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #22318

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #22694

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23130

@rengolin
Copy link
Member

mentioned in issue #23182

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23651

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23654

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23834

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23881

@labath
Copy link
Collaborator

labath commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23934

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23940

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24058

@eugenis
Copy link
Contributor

eugenis commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24178

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24205

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24271

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24362

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24483

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24485

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24760

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #24934

@stephenhines
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mentioned in issue #25713

@stephenhines
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mentioned in issue #26168

@kbeyls
Copy link
Collaborator

kbeyls commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #26867

This was referenced Jan 24, 2015
Open
Closed
@rengolin rengolin mentioned this issue Mar 5, 2015
Open
This was referenced Apr 18, 2015
Closed
Open
Closed
Closed
@labath labath mentioned this issue May 18, 2015
Closed
This was referenced May 18, 2015
Closed
Closed
@eugenis eugenis mentioned this issue Jun 10, 2015
Closed
This was referenced Jun 12, 2015
Open
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Open
This was referenced Oct 28, 2015
Closed
Closed
@kbeyls kbeyls mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2016
Closed
@thanm thanm mentioned this issue Feb 11, 2016
Closed
Open
@sebpop sebpop mannequin mentioned this issue Jul 2, 2016
Closed
@stephenhines stephenhines mentioned this issue Jul 20, 2016
Closed
@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 9, 2021
@llvmbot llvmbot added the confirmed Verified by a second party label Jan 26, 2022
@nico
Copy link
Contributor

nico commented May 9, 2023

Fixed by now afaik.

@nico nico closed this as completed May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla confirmed Verified by a second party metabug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests