Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fuzz] Assertion `!PP.getSourceManager().isBeforeInTranslationUnit(origLoc, Tok.getLocation()) && "ParseAssignmentExpression went over the default arg tokens!"' failed. #22218

Closed
llvmbot opened this issue Dec 10, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla clang Clang issues not falling into any other category

Comments

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Dec 10, 2014

Bugzilla Link 21844
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on Feb 22, 2016 14:21
Version trunk
OS Linux
Blocks #23431
Attachments test case
Reporter LLVM Bugzilla Contributor

Extended Description

Fuzzing discovered that the attached test case, when given as input to

clang -fno-crash-diagnostics -std=c++11 -xc++ -c -emit-llvm

causes this assertion failure:

clang-3.6: tools/clang/lib/Parse/ParseCXXInlineMethods.cpp:359: void clang::Parser::ParseLexedMethodDeclaration(clang::Parser::LateParsedMethodDeclaration &): Assertion `!PP.getSourceManager().isBeforeInTranslationUnit(origLoc, Tok.getLocation()) && "ParseAssignmentExpression went over the default arg tokens!"' failed.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

llvmbot commented Feb 22, 2016

The failing assertion had been removed in r225763. The test case seems ok with current trunk.

@kcc
Copy link
Contributor

kcc commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue #23431

@kcc kcc mentioned this issue Mar 28, 2015
@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 9, 2021
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants