New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge rL332302, rL332680, rL332682, rL332694 into 6.0.1 #36873
Comments
assigned to @majnemer |
Hi Craig, Are these X86 patches OK to merge? http://reviews.llvm.org/rL332680 |
Yes, they are ok to merge. Thanks! |
Keno, I tried merging these patches, but the domain-reassignment-test.ll fails, can you try merging these? |
Valentin Churavy has a version of these patches that he rebased against 6.0 and we're using for Julia: https://github.com/staticfloat/LLVMBuilder/blob/master/patches/llvm_patches/0014-llvm-rL332680.patch Maybe try those. I can also try doing it, but I'm not sure how to commit to the release branch, so in that case, I may need you to provide instructions. |
Will merging r324497 first make the other patches apply correctly? That patch regenerated the test with the update_mir_test script. |
That patch was is already in the release_60 branch. |
I was able to fix the test. I had to add -mcpu=skylake-avx512 to the llvm-mc invocation in the domain-reassignment-test.ll test. |
I've merged the X86 commits as r333469 and r333470 (I squashed the last to into one commit). |
Hi David, What do you think about the InstCombine patch: |
LGTM |
Merged the InstCombine fix: r333477 |
Extended Description
Please merge the following revisions into 6.0.1. They fix crashing bugs in
the julia test suite after the upgrade to LLVM 6.0:
rL332302 [InstCombine] fix crash due to ignored addrspacecast (Reviewer: arsenm)
rL332680 [X86DomainReassignment] Don't delete IMPLICIT_DEF nodes (Reviewer: craig.topper)
rL332682 [X86DomainReassignment] Don't compare stack-allocated values by address (Reviewer: craig.topper)
rL332694 [X86DomainReassignment] Hopefully fix buildbot failure (no reviewer, but just a typo fix in the test case for the previous one - can be squashed into that for the cherry-pick)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: