You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, great work!
I was wondering why warping is useful in this case. More specifically, what troubles me are the artifacts of the warping operation in the case of occlusions. Is there any guarantee that the warped image 2 we would get by using the ground truth flow is "closer" to image 1 than the warped image 2 we get by using the estimated flow in this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We fill occluded areas with 0s (black). In general the warping is useful to make a step towards the solution (or assessing the quality of the current solution). Compare e.g. the non-liner iteration in LDOF.
I do not see a case when warping with ground truth could be worse than warping with the prediction.
First of all, great work!
I was wondering why warping is useful in this case. More specifically, what troubles me are the artifacts of the warping operation in the case of occlusions. Is there any guarantee that the warped image 2 we would get by using the ground truth flow is "closer" to image 1 than the warped image 2 we get by using the estimated flow in this case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: