New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vote: Release 0.0.4 #27
Comments
Before a release, I would suggest reviewing validations that are now potentially made redundant by the fix to Exception handling, which LMDB does yield a proper return code for. I wouldn't close #3 quite yet (without working through the performance aspects), but I haven't had time to review. I suppose if there are no regressions in |
We can leave #3 for later. To be honest, I forgot about the PR. Will check ASAP. Go ahead with the release. |
@phraktle I reverted part of commits made for issues #21 and #26. The C side is now being relied upon for the error creation. I left #23 in place given our separate continuing conversations re I'll make a release in a few days, just to give a chance for us to determine what should happen with #23's guard. |
0.0.4 release completed. Travis log: https://travis-ci.org/lmdbjava/lmdbjava/jobs/159506341 0.0.4 will be available from Maven Central after their indexing / replication is complete. |
Seems about time we made a new release given the issues resolved since 0.0.3 on 12 August (bugs: #18, #25; usability improvements: #21, #23, #26).
@krisskross and @phraktle, any thoughts on this (eg do we want to finalise the
byte[]
work in PR #22 first)?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: