Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove SseListenerDict #2279

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 16, 2024
Merged

refactor: remove SseListenerDict #2279

merged 1 commit into from Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

dni
Copy link
Member

@dni dni commented Feb 15, 2024

logging and validation should be handled by the dict itself.

adds unnecessary complexity where nothing is gained.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5264677) 59.31% compared to head (e875778) 59.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2279      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.31%   59.27%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          60       60              
  Lines        9041     9026      -15     
==========================================
- Hits         5363     5350      -13     
+ Misses       3678     3676       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dni dni added this to the 0.12.2 milestone Feb 15, 2024
@motorina0 motorina0 added the code health Make the code more beautiful label Feb 15, 2024
@motorina0 motorina0 merged commit decd4cd into dev Feb 16, 2024
22 checks passed
@motorina0 motorina0 deleted the chore-listener-dict branch February 16, 2024 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code health Make the code more beautiful
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants