Double square brackets in conflict with orgmode syntax

[AtomicNess123]

Regarding the use of [[202012091130]] for links, doesn't this conflict with orgmode standard links?

[localauthor]

This is addressed in the README. https://github.com/localauthor/zk#using-org-mode-and-org-links

[AtomicNess123]

Great:

(defun zk-org-try-to-follow-link (fn &optional arg)
  "When 'org-open-at-point' FN fails, try 'zk-follow-link-at-point'.
Optional ARG."
  (let ((org-link-search-must-match-exact-headline t))
    (condition-case nil
	(apply fn arg)
      (error (zk-follow-link-at-point)))))

(advice-add 'org-open-at-point :around #'zk-org-try-to-follow-link)

I suppose this coudl be done as well for zetteldeft links? I'm currently using zetteldeft.

[localauthor]

Have you tried it?

Also, that code snippet is derived from code in this thread, on the very topic: EFLS/zetteldeft#99

In the future, please be sure to read the relevant READMEs and existing issue threads before opening new issues and asking for help.

[AtomicNess123]

Have you tried it?

Also, that code snippet is derived from code in this thread, on the very topic: EFLS/zetteldeft#99

In the future, please be sure to read the relevant READMEs and existing issue threads before opening new issues and asking for help.

Yes, I tried it and it works perfectly with zetteldeft, just needed to change zk-follow-link-at-point with zetteldeft-follow-link.

Sorry for opening this issue, I will read the docs next time.

One last question I couldn't find in the docs is the following: if I change the brackets to something else, will the previous files be updated with this change?

[localauthor]

Sorry for opening this issue, I will read the docs next time.

No worries!

One last question I couldn't find in the docs is the following: if I change the brackets to something else, will the previous files be updated with this change?

No, you would have to change them yourself.

[AtomicNess123]

Thank you!