You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
flags.DEFINE_float('geo_p_w', 1.0, 'geo point mathcing loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('geo_s_w', 10.0, 'geo symmetry loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('geo_f_w', 0.1, 'geo face loss, face must be consistent with the point cloud')
flags.DEFINE_float('prop_pm_w', 2.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('prop_sym_w', 1.0, 'importtannt for symmetric objects, can do point aug along reflection plane')
flags.DEFINE_float('prop_r_reg_w', 1.0, 'rot confidence must be sum to 1')
those are different from the paper( 1/8.0, 1/8.0, 1/8.0, 1. ,,,. 8.0, 1.0, 1.0) and also it seems like there are ssome unseen, newly added ones like recon_n_w recon_d_w recon_s_w prop_pm_w.
Could you please give me some advice about it?
Plus, I think I should add 'Geo_face' loss term for 3.5 Bounding Box - Pose Geometric Consistency. Right?
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We select the best configuration of hyper-parameters to achieve best performance, so some of them are different from the original setting in the paper. (however, most of them remain the same)
Hello! thanks for your kind sharing!
I saw the difference between your implementation and paper regarding the hyperparams(lambda 1, ~, 8 and so on)
flags.DEFINE_float('rot_1_w', 8.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('rot_2_w', 8.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('rot_regular', 4.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('tran_w', 8.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('size_w', 8.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_w', 8.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('r_con_w', 1.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_n_w', 3.0, 'normal estimation loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_d_w', 3.0, 'dis estimation loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_v_w', 1.0, 'voting loss weight')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_s_w', 0.3, 'point sampling loss weight, important')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_f_w', 1.0, 'confidence loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_bb_r_w', 1.0, 'bbox r loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_bb_t_w', 1.0, 'bbox t loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_bb_s_w', 1.0, 'bbox s loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('recon_bb_self_w', 1.0, 'bb self')
flags.DEFINE_float('mask_w', 1.0, 'obj_mask_loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('geo_p_w', 1.0, 'geo point mathcing loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('geo_s_w', 10.0, 'geo symmetry loss')
flags.DEFINE_float('geo_f_w', 0.1, 'geo face loss, face must be consistent with the point cloud')
flags.DEFINE_float('prop_pm_w', 2.0, '')
flags.DEFINE_float('prop_sym_w', 1.0, 'importtannt for symmetric objects, can do point aug along reflection plane')
flags.DEFINE_float('prop_r_reg_w', 1.0, 'rot confidence must be sum to 1')
those are different from the paper( 1/8.0, 1/8.0, 1/8.0, 1. ,,,. 8.0, 1.0, 1.0) and also it seems like there are ssome unseen, newly added ones like recon_n_w recon_d_w recon_s_w prop_pm_w.
Could you please give me some advice about it?
Plus, I think I should add 'Geo_face' loss term for 3.5 Bounding Box - Pose Geometric Consistency. Right?
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: