Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renaming the schema? #145

Open
stenskjaer opened this issue Jun 28, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Renaming the schema? #145

stenskjaer opened this issue Jun 28, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@stenskjaer
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a note pulled from @jeffreycwitt's notes:

Pros and cons for renaming?
Candidates for renaming? ScholaDoc, scta-text-schema

Pro for distancing the schema name from scta is that of all the schemas this is the most re-usable and it is a guiding principle of the schema, that it should contain sufficient info to be independently useful. That is doesn’t need to be connected to the scta rdf database to be able to be usefully displayed. LombardPress Schema helps capture that name. It also means the scta could adopt other schemas, but SCTA needs to identify rules that any “scta crawlable” schema must follow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant