You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At least for in vivo imaging data, transforms calculated between sessions are intended to correct for two things:
Movement of the imaged field of view from session-to-session (This should just be rotation/translation)
Warping of the tissue itself over time. (This should allow rotation/translation/shear?).
Two issues with the affine transforms we apply now:
There is no biological reason the scale factor between sessions should be anything other than 1.
Any kind of shear would be do to changes in the tissue as a whole, not the cells themselves, so it should effectively only be applied to the spacing between ROIs, not the shape of the ROIs themselves.
Ideally, calculate/apply transforms separately on the ROI centroids and the ROI shapes. At least only apply the calculated shear to the centroids.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At least for in vivo imaging data, transforms calculated between sessions are intended to correct for two things:
Two issues with the affine transforms we apply now:
Ideally, calculate/apply transforms separately on the ROI centroids and the ROI shapes. At least only apply the calculated shear to the centroids.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: