-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
question: About estimation of hurst exponent. #27
Comments
Dear @yukki-jpn, you caught a very good point – which is in fact incorrect! This is indeed described in the original paper1, the authors explicitly state that the optimal lag to fit the fluctuation function is somewhere between I am working already on changing this in the README and I have to surely do the same for the documentation, I don't want to lead the reader to something that is incorrect. The results one obtains using short segments are not necessarily wrong, but there are cases where they do lead to wrong estimation. Overall, MFDFA tends to underestimate the Hurst coefficients in purely fractal timeseries. 1Kantelhardt, J. W., Zschiegner, S. A., Koscielny-Bunde, E., Havlin, S., Bunde, A., & Stanley, H. E. (2002). Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 316(1-4), 87–114 |
Dear @LRydin We are currently writing a paper on the long memory process in the financial market, and we intend to use your program and quote your paper. We, therefore, need some peer reviews of our statistical procedure on the estimation of the Hurst exponent. Could you help us with peer review of our paper? |
Dear @yukki-jpn, I'm happy to help in anyway I can :). |
Dear @LRydin We are glad to hear such a reply. We want to get in touch with you using email. Could you let me know your email address if you disclose your email address? Otherwise, please send me an email at s2120443(at)s.tsukuba.ac.jp (please replace (at) into @). I think either I or Dr. Kanazawa will make contact with you in a few days. |
You can find me at leonardo.rydin@gmail.com :). |
I have a question about
In README.md, you argued ``We will fit the first points, since the results are more accurate there'', and used the first points to estimate Hurst exponent. Is there any evidence, such as papers or results of numerical simulations, that you can say so? (I thought this description was intuitively different from the methods described in the original paper of DFA.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: