Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementing geometric mean for consensus opinion/levels_mean #7

Open
ryan-caesar-ramos opened this issue Jul 20, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@ryan-caesar-ramos
Copy link

ryan-caesar-ramos commented Jul 20, 2021

Hi, I'm trying to implement the consensus opinion (levels_mean) as a geometric mean of the top-down predictions, bottom-up predictions, attention-weighted average of same-level embeddings, and embeddings of the previous time step as described by the original paper. Any ideas on how the weights should be set?

At first I thought this could be a learnable parameter, but section 9.1 reads

For interpreting a static image with no temporal context, the weights used for this weighted geometric mean need to change during the iterations that occur after a new fixation.

which leads me to believe that these might need to be outputted on the fly a la vanilla attention as opposed to being learned. Maybe an MLP that takes in the four source embeddings and outputs four scalars as weights?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant