Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison between Lucky and Amber #508

Closed
paulcsmith opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Comparison between Lucky and Amber #508

paulcsmith opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@paulcsmith
Copy link
Member

paulcsmith commented Jun 14, 2018

https://gitter.im/luckyframework/Lobby?at=5b228b55fd5b835b2d5ba223

I think it would be helpful to work together with the Amber team to generate a comparison doc that we both feel is fair. That way people will have an easier time deciding what framework they'd like to work with.

Something similar to https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/comparison.html

Specifically:

  • What do they both do
  • What does one do that the other doesn't
  • How do they do the same thing differently, and what are the pros/and cons
@fernandes
Copy link
Contributor

more discussion on crystal-loot/web-framework-comparison#1

@karmakaze
Copy link

The discussion on crystal-loot/web-framework-comparison#1 is very detailed.
It would be good to come up with a high-level summary from that.

In addition to points listed by @paulcsmith I would like to add:

  • edit/recompile mechanism and speed for seeing changes
  • different use cases, or developer backgrounds which may better suit one or the other

@paulcsmith
Copy link
Member Author

Great ideas @karmakaze!

I'll close this and post new discussion to
crystal-loot/web-framework-comparison#1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants