Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inconsistent segments #47

Closed
ghost opened this issue Aug 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

inconsistent segments #47

ghost opened this issue Aug 18, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 18, 2021

Hi,

I'm using effmass module to determine the effective masses of some layered materials. However, there is a problem that I could not find a solution yet. I'd appreciate your help and suggestions.

When I plot effective masses in different directions for different HfS2 bulk systems (optimized with different levels), efmass shows a segment that does not available in other plot. All band structure calculations were performed using FHI-aims with HSE06+SOC level. The first plot shows effmass plot for HSE06+SOC@PBE+D3 and the second one shows for HSE06+SOC@PBE+D4.
image
image
Because of that reason effective masses in directions [100] and [110] are incomparable. Thanks in advance

@lucydot
Copy link
Owner

lucydot commented Aug 31, 2021

Hi @ebirkan,

It looks that in your second plot the maxima has been shifted away from gamma and now sits along the G-M line - difficult to say without data but there could be a little "kink" in the G-M line. Effmass defines a maxima as a point with two lower energy points either side - it is no more clever than that!

If that is the case then effmass is working as expected (correct me if I'm wrong) and is reflecting your DFT calculated dispersion (you could verify this by looking at the energies in your data directly).

If the "kink" is there then how you deal with that will depend on the context of the problem, perhaps a question better suited to members of your research group or collaborators.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 10, 2021

Thanks for the comment and suggestions. I'll follow your suggestions

@lucydot
Copy link
Owner

lucydot commented Feb 22, 2022

Hi @ebirkan - did you solve the issue you were having? If so, I will close this discussion.

@lucydot lucydot closed this as completed May 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant