You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been having issues lately with a singular setup with VMs running in the same physical host. I have the following testbed:
There are two QEMU/KVM VMs created with the netmap-enabled QEMU fork, directly connected to each other through a netmap pipe. That work properly, I can send traffic to ens5 interfaces, and it flows properly through the underlying netmap pipe. For example, I can do the following simple experiment attaching two pkt-gen instances in each ens5 and it works as expected.
However, if I try to replicate the same experiment but with a VALE switch, I cannot receive traffic to the other side:
I think it is important to note that, although I am not receiving traffic in the other side, the logs from dmesg look like if everything is going fine, so I cannot see any error anywhere that could point me to the actual issue.
Am I missing something? Is this a setup that is not intended to work like that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi all!
I've been having issues lately with a singular setup with VMs running in the same physical host. I have the following testbed:
There are two QEMU/KVM VMs created with the netmap-enabled QEMU fork, directly connected to each other through a netmap pipe. That work properly, I can send traffic to
ens5
interfaces, and it flows properly through the underlying netmap pipe. For example, I can do the following simple experiment attaching twopkt-gen
instances in eachens5
and it works as expected.However, if I try to replicate the same experiment but with a VALE switch, I cannot receive traffic to the other side:
I think it is important to note that, although I am not receiving traffic in the other side, the logs from
dmesg
look like if everything is going fine, so I cannot see any error anywhere that could point me to the actual issue.Am I missing something? Is this a setup that is not intended to work like that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: