Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verfahren mit PaToH testen #4

Closed
poettig opened this issue May 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Verfahren mit PaToH testen #4

poettig opened this issue May 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@poettig
Copy link
Collaborator

poettig commented May 28, 2018

Könnte problematisch sein, da PaToH anscheinend falsche Ergebnisse berechnet:

I again played around with PaToH and used their edge balancing feature [2]. Unfortunately both solution quality AND the reported block sizes (in terms of
hyperedges per block) seems to be wrong. I double checked the PaToH result both with my tool and with hMetis (and both tools report the same results, which
are significantly different from the results PaToH reports for its partition).
I'm on vacation tomorrow, but I'll contact the main author/developer of PaToH on Monday and ask whether I'm doing something wrong or edge-balancing
is actually broken in PaToH.

Falls nichts kommt, mal bei Sebastian nachfragen!

@lukashuebner
Copy link
Owner

Duplika von "2-Phasen Ansatz"

@lukashuebner lukashuebner added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Jun 4, 2018
@lukashuebner lukashuebner removed this from the Milestone Meeting 2 milestone Jun 4, 2018
@poettig poettig closed this as completed Jun 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants